Journal of Healthcare Quality and Safety banner
Journal Profile

Journal of Healthcare Quality and Safety

Journal of Healthcare Quality and Safety (JHQS) is an international peer-reviewed, open access journal focused on promoting healthcare quality improvement, patient safety, and healthcare management through research and innovations. It serves as an academic journal for healthcare professionals, scholars, and academics involved in researching in this particular field to publish their findings and innovations in healthcare quality improvement, patient safety, and healthcare management.

Journal promotes the publishing of scientific knowledge in order to ensure excellence in healthcare quality improvement and patient safety. Contributions in Journal of Healthcare Quality and Safety cover issues related to patient-centered care, clinical governance, healthcare management, risk assessment and mitigation, infection control and prevention, healthcare technology, quality assurance, public health safety, healthcare policy, and performance measurement, among others. In addition, the journal encourages research on innovative methods for improving the performance of healthcare organizations through better outcomes, patient safety culture development, and efficiency of healthcare facilities.

Submissions to JHQS pass through a strict peer review and editorial evaluation process aimed at establishing the manuscript's scientific quality, originality, ethical validity, and relevance. As a result, any researcher is welcome to access the information available in the journals because of its open-access nature, making the dissemination of knowledge easier. Consequently, the information provided in JHQS can reach a larger audience and influence the way healthcare quality and safety issues are managed.

For publisher inquiries, please email us: info@velnorapublishers.com

Email: healthcare@velnorapublishers.com

ISSN
2049-7312
Frequency
Quarterly
Impact Snapshot
2.84 CiteScore
Indexing & Abstracting
Scopus, DOAJ, CrossRef

Editorial Office

Editor-in-Chief: Editorial leadership pending

Journal metadata is managed from the admin panel.

healthcare@velnorapublishers.com

Published research

Latest Articles

Recent published articles from Journal of Healthcare Quality and Safety.

Original Article

Lessons from Beijing for Lahore: Toward an Evidence-Based National Clean Air Policy for Pakistan

Background: Pakistan was ranked the most polluted country in IQAir’s 2025 report, with a national annual mean PM2.5 of 67.3μg/m³, roughly 13 times the WHO guideline, and nine of the world’s 25 most polluted cities. The country adopted its first National Clean Air Policy in 2023, yet Lahore still sits near 90μg/m³. Beijing brought its annual mean from close to 90 down to 30.5μg/m³ between 2013 and 2024. Objective: To identify which parts of Beijing’s clean air governance can reasonably be carried over to Lahore, and to locate the gaps in Pakistan’s current framework. Methods: Qualitative, desk-based comparative policy analysis of peer-reviewed studies, official documents, multilateral project records and monitoring reports available to October 2026, organized around eight governance domains. Findings: Beijing’s improvement rested on a time-bound national plan with binding targets, simultaneous control of coal, industry, vehicles and dust, official accountability, and openly reported monitoring. Pakistan’s framework is advisory rather than statutory, proposes an annual PM2.5 target of 35μg/m³ against an existing standard of 15, had minimal regulatory monitoring outside Punjab in late 2023, lacks an agreed public account of Lahore’s pollution sources, has no airshed-level authority, and gives the health sector no defined role. The methods behind Lahore’s competing source estimates cannot be ranked with confidence, and eye-disease odds ratios from lower-exposure settings cannot be transferred to Lahore. Conclusions: Eight reforms are proposed, starting with a statutory basis for ambient standards and an independent source apportionment for Lahore. The reforms take their design logic from Beijing; they do not copy China’s institutional model. Personal accountability of named officials is placed at provincial level, where legal authority sits.

View Full Text PDF
Opinion Article

The Fragility of Critical Medication Alerts in Electronic Prescriptions: The Need for Governance and Organizational Culture

This opinion article discusses the limits and fragility of automated prescription alerts for critical medications when implemented in healthcare systems without proper clinical governance and cultural alignment of the teams. Although Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) are designated as essential barriers to error prevention, excessive and miscalibrated signaling triggers the phenomenon of alert fatigue, leading professionals to compulsively dismiss warnings and become desensitized to risk. Additionally, it examines how the high cost of acquiring and maintaining these technologies, when isolated from improvements in care processes, pressures public and private budgets without generating effective safety gains. It is concluded that technology is not self-sufficient and that the effectiveness of alerts depends on the consolidation of the triad between people, processes, and technology, supported by standardized clinical protocols and ongoing continuing education programs.

View Full Text PDF
Submit Manuscript